Endogenous Cartel Organization and Antitrust Fine Discrimination
نویسنده
چکیده
Third parties such as trade associations often assist cartels by collecting and evaluating market behaviour at the firm level. Under incomplete information neutral market oversight helps to distinguish defecting from complying behaviour, increasing the effectiveness of punishments for defectors and increasing cartel persistence. We investigate how cartels sort themselves into different organizational forms and whether cartel enforcement can be improved by setting fines contingent on the organizational form. A fine reduction for firms operating without the help of a third party causes some cartels to switch to a less persistent organizational form. Two drawbacks of this fine differentiation are that some new cartels will arise and that some of the existing cartels will become more persistent as the need to punish defectors decreases. Our paper is the first in the marginal deterrence literature to identify this second effect.
منابع مشابه
Legal Principles in Antitrust Enforcement
We study antitrust enforcement that channels price-fixing incentives through setting fines and allocating resources to detection activities. Antitrust fines obey four legal principles: punishments should fit the crime, proportionality, bankruptcy considerations, and minimum fines. Bankruptcy considerations limit maximum fines, ensure abnormal cartel profits and impose a challenge for optimal an...
متن کاملStrictness of leniency programs and asymmetric punishment effect
We analyze the impact of leniency programs on the behavior of firms participating in illegal cartel agreements in a two-stage repeated game model. Our approach takes into account asymmetric punishment effect and allows to discuss the design of leniency programs in the setting with asymmetries. The main contribution of the paper is that we consider heterogeneous firms. This heterogeneity results...
متن کاملAntitrust Enforcement and Marginal Deterrence
We study antitrust enforcement in which the fine must obey four legal principles: punishments should fit the crime, proportionality, bankruptcy considerations, and minimum fines. We integrate these legal principles into an infinitely-repeated oligopoly model. Bankruptcy considerations ensure abnormal cartel profits. We derive the optimal fine schedule that achieves maximal social welfare under ...
متن کاملEquilibrium Cartel Pricing in the Presence of an Antitrust Authority∗
Price-fixing is characterized when firms are concerned about creating suspicions about collusion and bringing forth antitrust penalties. Antitrust laws have a complex effect on pricing as they influence the conditions determining the internal stability of the cartel. Dynamics are driven by two forces the sensitivity of detection to price movements causes a cartel to gradually raise price while ...
متن کاملS ome implications of antitrust laws for cartel pricing *
Price dynamics are characterized for a price-fixing cartel. Antitrust laws reduce cartel prices even though cartel detection occurs with probability zero. In response to cheating, the non-collusive price gradually moves from the collusive price to the static Nash equilibrium price. 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
متن کامل